25 June | 2017 | Subject Middle East & North Africa (MENA)
In fact, many observers had known for quite some time that there were latent tensions amongst the 6 members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) that was established in 1981.
One way of cataloguing the divergences within those six countries would be to place Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain in one corner, with Oman and Qatar in another corner, and Kuwait occupying rather awkwardly the middle ground. This is not a description of their economic links but rather of their political discords that are centred broadly on relations with Iran, the support or enmity toward movements or persons sourcing themselves in some way or other from the Muslim Brotherhood as well as the muzzling of Al-Jazeera satellite TV.
Mind you, the world had witnessed a previous rehearsal of this crisis in March 2014, but it did not reach the stringent level of blockades and sanctions that are - to pick a phrase from US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson - neither reasonable nor actionable. However, the recent changes in the patrilineal succession structures of Saudi Arabia, the increasing closeness between the Crown Princes of the Kingdom and the UAE, as well as the bling-friendly visit of President Donald J Trump to Riyadh last month, all coalesced to bring this crisis to a head.
So what are some of my salient observations as the world struggles with a new Arab-focused #GCCCrisis?
Let me be quite clear! When Qatar is accused of harbouring close relations with Iran, I recall that this also applies to other GCC countries such as Kuwait and Oman. Moreover, economic relations between Iran and the UAE are at least as strong as those between Qatar and Iran. In fact, with trade exchanges of some $16 billion, the UAE has been one of Iran’s large trade partners despite legal tussles and bristling words since 1971 over the three Emirati islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb. And when Qatar is accused of being too close to the Muslim Brotherhood or other Islamist and jihadist groups, should one not point out that other countries, whether in the GCC or MENA, have also cooperated inside or outside government with some of those groups?
This is where I revert to a favourite verse from St Matthew’s Gospel, "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?” (Matt 7:3). Every GCC country has a history and it is best not to air one’s own dirty laundry in public without the wisdom of ample aforethought.
As Arab intellectuals and seasoned observers have reminded us time and again, the Arab World is alarmingly raddled with disagreements, tensions and subterfuge. But this latest #GCCCrisis, and the subsequent list of grievances, bring two essential and disquieting questions to mind. I wonder whether this tribal spat is solely about those 13 grievances alone, or is it really a precursor for the reconstitution of a new MENA region with a fresh constellation of alliances? There is a sense among many Arabs that new geostrategic realities leading toward key changes are being shoehorned into the whole region. After all, just look at Iraq today with Mosul being recaptured and Iraqi Kurdistan aiming for some form of quasi-independence. Just look also at the way that the Palestinian aspirations have been summarily shunted aside no matter the justifications, or the way that the Syrian regime is gradually being reinstalled along key parts of the country. I do not wish also to point out to the chaos in Libya or Yemen, or the hasty agreements in Lebanon, that together suggest new strategic and demographic realties.
Moreover, there is another disturbing factor in this crisis for me. Are those 13 stringent demands only a negotiating ploy by the quartet of ‘aggrieved’ countries whereby they ramp up the tensions only to negotiate a robust compromise with Qatar? Or should I stray into more unsettling zones? Describing Qatar as a “Trojan horse” within the group of Arab monarchies, Anwar Mohammed Gargash, a senior UAE official, stated that the alternative to an agreement is not escalation but a parting of the ways with Qatar. Do I therefore deduce that those grievances were deliberately pitched at such a high premium so that non-compliance by Qatar would become the only available option for it and therefore lead to its ejection from the GCC?
The #GCCCrisis is a high-stakes conflict with paternalistic overtones that cannot be allowed to rumble for long lest the whole edifice of the GCC unravels and leads to further instability not only for the GCC and MENA leaders but also for our interests in the West. More importantly too, another falling out would invariably affect the ordinary men, women and children in most of those countries who often end up bearing the brunt of oppressive and controlling dictatorships anyway. However, my own experience in the MENA and Gulf regions over many long years suggests that heavy-handedness can produce a boomerang effect and that silencing the messenger does not necessarily silence the message.
The GCC countries are today brimming with huge potential as well as natural resources that go beyond oil and gas fields. Just consider for instance the ‘Saudi Vision 2030’ economic plans, the Qatari ‘2022 FIFA World Cup’, or even the resplendent UAE development plans. Should much of this be imperilled for the sake of power and control by one side or the other?
Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson admonished GCC leaders to adopt ‘measured and realistic’ steps that would facilitate a resolution of this recondite crisis. I pray that the GCC rulers and their allies would apply sagacity and sangfroid in resolving this crisis and ensuring that the storm they have created does not jump out of the teacup.
Who knows, Eid El-Fitr this week could perhaps serve as a motivating catalyst too.
© Dr Harry Hagopian | 2017 | 25 June